ivvi K5发布售价2199：3D显示效果出众 服务应用多样

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Russian Federation (orthographic projection) highlighted.svg

百度 关爱行动已动员550万名志愿者，与1482万名农民工子女开展结对服务。

no visibility of South Kuril islands --Yuriy Kolodin (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

This map should be deleted, because South Kuril islands are too small to be visible on the map of Russian Federation. There is no encyclopedic value of this image. Its creation should be treated as a kind of disruption. --Yuriy Kolodin (talk) 08:49, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

 Keep. 1. We can see South Kuril islands clearly. 2. Franz Josef Land is also very small relatively to territory of Russian Federation, there are also many another small islands under Russian administration. I think, that the small size of some islands is a rather strange reason for deletion of map of some big territory, that is much bigger than these islands, because we always will see small parts of big thing badly at the common map of this big thing. Map of Russian Federation obviously has encyclopedic value. P.S. Could Yuriy Kolodin say, disruption of what rule he see in creation of image? Dinamik (talk) 10:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

There is no sense of this image, because we cannot see the highlighting because of the small size of the islands relatively to the territory of Russian Federation.--Yuriy Kolodin (talk) 11:31, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

In such situation we should delete all maps of big countries, because we couldn't see small parts of them clearly. Dinamik (talk) 12:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

We have the same file File:Russian Federation (orthographic projection).svg without highlighting, file with highlighting has no sense, because we cannot see the highlighting. Too small territory is highlighted. Please compare two files:

• • • with highlighting:
    • 
    • and without highlighting
    • .
    • Is any visible difference between them? So, what is the sense of highlighting? --Yuriy Kolodin (talk) 11:38, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
      • You chose resolution, with using of which you couldn't see difference clearly, another users can choose another resolution and see small parts of Russia, that they want to see. What is the sense of deleting free image with correct information? Dinamik (talk) 12:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

• This is an obvious  Keep: even if someone deliberately left out the mentioned islands, then deletion would not be the answer. This is a high-quality image with a clear educational value. You can only blame the South Kuril islands for being damn small compared to Russia... —Quibik (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
• What is a name of water body in Northern Primorsky Krai (or east Habarovsk Krai)? Is it Amur River so wide river? --Pauk (talk) 13:47, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

---

Kept, bogus deletion request. Kameraad Pjotr 20:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Russian Federation (orthographic projection) highlighted.svg

No Kuril Islands Karel (talk) 09:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

It is not true. If you see this image with low resolution, of course, you don't see them, because Russia is big and Kuril Islands are small. If you choose bigger resolution, you will see Kuril Islands. Dinamik (talk) 10:03, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

---

Kept: speedy kept Denniss (talk) 22:04, 5 June 2012 (UTC)